this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2023
93 points (87.8% liked)

Games

32671 readers
607 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if you would be so adamant to defend AI if it could copy your work, and even your exact style by prompting your public name. I am going to bet on no

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm a software engineer and AI can already do a lot of my programming and it's great! Most of my software is FOSS - so your bet is very wrong.

If somehow AI kills programming and puts me out of job then that's great! I'll find another job and we'll be living in objectively better world because code is suddenly infinitely more accessible and powerful :)

So, to me this protectionism thought process is very alien. Especially when it comes to something relatively meaningless as entertainment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When you chose a FOSS license you explicitly say that you are ok with derivatives of your work. These artists never distributed their work under a license where they allowed AI to be trained on it and make derivatives of it.

AI is far from replacing programmers. It can replace some simple boilerplate, but is nowhere near understanding the logic behind applications. So you simply say this knowing you are safe for tens of years more.