I have a workaround so this isn't exactly a problem for me. I'm just curious about what is going on, and what best practices are.
I'm setting up Arion. I think it will be helpful for my development flow in a project where I have several services that need to run and communicate with each other. Docker-compose is a nice way to handle this, but you have to have a Docker image to run, and it's a pain to create a new image after each code change. OTOH Arion will run an arbitrary command, and creates Nix-friendly images automatically. Very promising!
The Nix expression for the service I'm developing is exported from a flake, while the arion
executable reads its configuration from a Nix expression that is not a flake. There is an example configuration that recommends importing a flake using builtins.getFlake
which you can see here: https://github.com/hercules-ci/arion/blob/main/examples/flake/arion-pkgs.nix
The problem is that builtins.getFlake
is slow. It adds >20s to every arion
command I run. That includes starting services, reading logs, removing stopped containers, etc.
The example config includes a fallback that loads the flake using flake-compat instead of builtins.getFlake
. When I use flake-compat loading the flake is nearly instant.
So I'm using flake-compat, and that seems to be working. (Many thanks to the flake-compat author!) But I'm curious why builtins.getFlake
is so slow.
I noticed that Arion has an interesting option,
useHostStore = true
, for services that are defined using a command or a nixos config instead of a Docker image. This mounts the host system's/nix/store
directory in the running container. It looks like the image that gets produced is only a customization layer with the command to run, environment variables, etc. It looks quite efficient.I haven't checked, but I'd guess that if you don't use
useHostStore
you get layered images. Those are great for image layer reuse, but they do involve copying store paths to the local image repository.