this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
748 points (90.3% liked)

Games

16806 readers
1355 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I get it. Steam doesn't seem to do exclusivity deals with 3rd party titles. So you could still sell your game on gog and humble without issue.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They control prices though, can't sell for less on another platform.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course you can, just not steam keys.

[–] Honytawk 1 points 1 year ago

If it was only about Steam keys, there wouldn't have been a lawsuit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They don't though? Devs set the price. Steam just says that you need the same base price there as elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah because if you don't, they delist your game. That's the literal definition of anti-competitiveness. They could never get away with that if they weren't a monopoly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's the literal definition of anti-competitiveness.

No it isn't. That's actually a very common store policy that's been in place since the days of brick and mortar locations. Why do you think you never see any platform listing games at higher or lower full retail prices than every other one regularly, even when they're not on Steam?

Where did you get the idea that this was the definition of anti-competitive? There are so many more things that define it more, like buying up all the competition or taking a big hit on loss leading pricing to force the competition to undercut themselves and collapse.