this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
155 points (98.1% liked)

UK Politics

3073 readers
139 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (52 children)

Not from the UK but... the damage is already done right?

I mean rejoining was always going to be inevitable, the only question is whether it's now or in 50 years, or incrementally over 50 years.

Point is, it will be on EUs terms.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (28 children)

It was utter stupidity. The only nation in the history of the world to impose economic sanctions on its self. The nation was lied to so a select few very rich people could make their lives easier.

Do you know what the most googled term was after the referendum? "What is the EU?"

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (27 children)

The only nation in the history of the world to impose economic sanctions on its self

A very naïve view on how the world works. There are plenty of countries that have voted for secession, and secession will always have an economic impact.

It can only be considered stupid if there was enough information to understand the effects of the decision prior to taking it. Because of the lies and money spent on campaigns, the relevant information was tainted. Sitting on your high horse and calling people stupid is never going to convince people to change their minds.

The most googled search reference of 2016 was not “What is the EU?”. It did not even strike the top 10.

I agree Brexit was a bad decision, but two wrong don't make a right. Attacking people for being misinformed is not an intelligent choice imo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Attacking people for being misinformed

But, I was told people were not stupid and they knew what they were voting for. How dare I assume they didn't understand the implication and how dare I think I know more about it than they did.

I understand your point that attacking people and calling them stupid wont "make them change their mind". But they had the time to research and understand the implications before the referendum. They've had much more time now to go back over it.

Banging your head on the wall pretending it won't hurt, doesn't make you misinformed or need education. It makes you stupid and it needs to be called out. I don't need to convince someone that banging their head on a wall will hurt.

Sadly, I do need them to stop banging their head on the wall. As it's a shared house and we've all got to live here. Holes in the wall ain't helping anyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Stupid is as stupid does. You have no evidence that people understood. There is plenty of evidence people are changing their mind now they are seeing the effects.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments (48 replies)