ama
Welcome to /c/AmA
Want a scheduled AMA announced ahead of time? Contact Awoo directly at the bottom of this sidebar.
Please stick to one of either three post types:
A standard Ask Me Anything post.
A request post -- (What is the format and why should I make a request post?)
A gauging interest post -- (What is this?)
What is an AmA?
AmA’s or “Ask Me Anything” began on the old internet, originally AOL chatrooms, later followed by Slashdot. They are crowdsourced interviews where the interviewee first makes a post describing who they are and what they do. Commenters then leave questions and can vote on other questions according to which they would like to see answered.
The interviewee can then go through and reply to the questions they find interesting, and easily see those questions the internet is dying to have the answer too. Questions will be a mixture of radical, serious and lighthearted resulting in the kind of interview you won’t get elsewhere.
What Topics Are Allowed?
Anyone can do an Ask Me Anything. The topic of the AmA must meet the rules below, and in some cases you must provide proof of the claims you are making. Ask Me Anything topics fall into two categories:
Something that plays a central role in your life. The prime example of this is a person's job; posts about someone's occupation are almost always allowed. A person's topic should be something that they know thoroughly and is important to them; this gives them more to discuss and a more thorough background in the field.
A truly interesting and unique event. An example would be "I organised a protest against x." It's an activity that doesn't play a central role in someone's life but is so uncommon that many users would not have experiences of their own to relate to it.
AmAs should NOT be about:
Mutual-Aid and Crowd Funding - AmA submitters that include any aid or funding campaign must be eligible for an AmA without the campaign for it to be allowed. Additionally, the focus of the AmA must not be the campaign -- those posts would be more appropriate in the mutual-aid community. Posts about suicide.
Other Restrictions:
Giveaways are not permitted on AmA. Contests and giveaways already running on a third party site prior to the AmA are acceptable
Proof
Proof in the case of public figures or orgs may be a social media post on an official account. For other topics it may be a proof image. This does not always have to be included in the post at the time of posting and it may be discussed with the moderators and provided privately. We will ALWAYS respect your complete privacy.
view the rest of the comments
Hello JT, what do you think about debate-bro/sis content?
Is debate from a leftist perspective valuable in the youtube/streaming space?
While not a general political debate person I've found nominal.naomi's videos really helpful when advocating for trans-rights in context of discussion/debate
Probably my least favorite content in the political sphere. I imagine a lot of that is my intensely negative interactions with the two big “lefty” debate bros. One of them routinely sends his little gremlins to brigade my videos. They’re a cancer. I’ve never been the biggest fan of debate in general, I’ve yet to see a compelling case that it actually changes minds. That could just be my own preconceived notions on the subject though
Thanks for the answer, yea the sad clout-chasing behavior of the big 4 (destiny, va*sh, keffals, and hasan) is a detriment. There is a good amount of dicussion here regarding the "pipeline" for leftist theory that these types of creators do however there is a notable sea-change towards trashing "tankies"
Joke question feel free to disregard; how long until a U.S politician says "tankie" on television?
One of these is not like the others
yeah hasan's primary content is react / news analysis however he has been dipping his toes into it with h3h3 & leftovers and the XQC "debates" but I would say those are the highest sub count political streamers idk I'm open to being wrong on this lol
might have more been a commentary on keffals being a drop in the bucket compared to those 3. even at her peak before the anticommunist/debatelord shit really kicked off she was much smaller.
That makes sense, and I agree but her twitter "presence" it outsized compared to viewer/sub count but for me she is like the quintessential representation of the "left" adjacent political/debate streamer as she is just so craven.
I am not talking about Keffals. Who is in this picture, and who is not?
Edit: This is shopped
ah the based/cringe dichotomy not the high follower count/low follower count
Is that pic even real? I mean it totally checks out but I couldn't find the source on google or tineye weirdly.
Whatever their follower count, the 3 of them are the only streamers named who are taking part in an establishment dem stream stream tomorrow morning
@[email protected] was the one who posted it so maybe LiberalScratcher knows the source. Apparently it was taken by Brianna Wu
Looking at it again, that's definitely shopped lol, sorry for posting it
dang you're right. they did a pretty good job, by my standards at least. it looks a little off but no one thing made me go "definitely photoshopped" until I realized how uneven the grainyness was across the 3 of them and the background