Lemmy NSFW

11889 readers

11 users here now

Updates about lemmynsfw.com

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

215

Should we ban scat fetish? (lemmynsfw.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

NSFW 172 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As admins, we removed the scat communities, thinking that scat was covered by the NSFL. However, some people have opposing views on this matter. What do you think about it? If people want it allowed, then we can restore content.

https://strawpoll.com/wby5Ae7PXyA

Edit: My answer for friends in the comments; The main reason NSFL was banned is because we currently don't have the tools to separate porn from NSFL. I'm in favor of the ban because I think its the same way in scat. If we had enough tools right now, we wouldn't be ban the NSFL either. Although, I agree that voting for niche fetishes doesn't make sense.

Edit 2: Also I don't want to think about shit anymore. I'm out 😀 https://lemmynsfw.com/post/117500

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

VPN Votes not allowed.

My vote is that we ban it here. I think the best solution for these issues is to have at least two NSFW instances. One that's more tightly moderated and more socially acceptable, and a second that's run with a more Libertarian wildboi flair. Business up front, party in the back. Maybe call the other one something like LemmyTrueNSFW, or LemmyWildNSFW, or something like that. This is how Federation achieves censorship-resistance. It allows a space for those on the fringe, while preventing the fringe from overwhelming the normie majority.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like this option, I agree that while It's not something I'm into I feel like we should not kink shame those who are. Creating a second instance for the more taboo things allows for it to exist but we still won't see it while browsing 'All' in lemmynsfw. But it's there for those who want to subscribe to it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Actually it would still show up in All as long as at least one user on this instance is subscribed to a community on the other one. Just not in Local.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a very good idea tbh.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess I have a couple of those, from time to time. Damned if I know when one is coming, though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

A business front instance and a pro bono back there.