this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
2116 points (96.6% liked)

Lefty Memes

4407 readers
230 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Regardless of how hard it's to do this, you'll get what out of this... 15B? That's nothing... the government spends that in less than a day. Maybe cut government spending in half first. None of this is sustainable.

https://www.usdebtclock.org/

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You hear that everyone? $15 billion is nothing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

…yeah when you think about how the US government spends money, a one-time injection of 15 bil is nothing. Hell, the combined lifetime wealth of ALL billionaires wouldn’t reach the ANNUAL budget of the US military.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You do understand that the government budget is 4 trillion per year, right? Do the math! What's wrong with you?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It may blow your mind but there are more than 3 wealthy people that live in the USA.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago

Do the total and calculate it all and show me whether it's gonna last you a few days.

You plebs can't do elementary school math and think you should talk policy. What a joke.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

well, the top 25 wealthiest americans are together worth about 1.8 trillion, which according to your clock is just about the federal budget deficit and a third of federal spending. The numbers OP gave assume a tax rate of 3% which is already fairly substantial (it would be 3% of the deficit), but we could always raise that number if you feel fit isn't enough.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'll do you one better. Even if you take ALL their money, that's less than 6 months budget. You steal it from them, spend it in a few months, and you're back where you started in no time. It doesn't fix anything or change anything, but introduces tremendous problems (like inflation).

And besides that and completely ignoring all these direct problems, these assets are not even liquid (Surprise surprise, Jeff Bezos doesn't store $5B in his safe). So, in order to cash them out, you're gonna have to sell them on the open markets, crash the stock markets, crash real estate markets, etc, which will lead to much higher unemployment, and pension funds will be destroyed (just like in 2008), and millions will go bankrupt. And all this even ignores that the net worth you're assigning to them ignores slippage, so it's much less than 1.8 Trillion when sold on the open market, ignoring automated bots that will sell even more to protect their hedge funds.

Yes, let's do all that destruction in the economy just for 6 months worth of spending. Great plan!

Like I always say: A bunch of ignorant, uneducated, stupid and entitled teenagers who don't know anything about the economy want to decide how the economy works. Go read a book, and stop telling us how to run the world before you learn how the world works. Go learn, and your realistic suggestions are welcome. We all want a better world.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll do you one better. Even if you take ALL their money, that's less than 6 months budget.

You're completely missing the point. There are more than just 3 billionaires in the US. There are more than even 25 billionaires in the US.

You steal it from them, spend it in a few months, and you're back where you started.

You're the only one here talking about seizing their entire estate. So sure, your plan is bad, let's not do it that way.

Like I always say: a bunch of ignorant, uneducated, stupid and entitled teenagers who don't know anything about the economy want to decide how the economy works.

Dude, you're talking to two people who are counting billionaires. This weird 'dumb teenager ' fantasy is all you.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Make a better calculation then come back, and stop criticizing examples. If you understand statistics, you'll see why whether 25 or 50 billionaires doesn't make much of a difference. They all mostly follow inverse function distribution in wealth. There's a law for it, forgot the name. So, no matter what amount you scrape from the top, it won't make a difference.

Again, ignorance in real world phenomenon and attempts to talk policy. Please stop! Read a book!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

come back, and stop criticizing examples

I'll do that as soon as you define an "inverse function distribution" and give me the name of this "law".

No matter what amount you scrape from.the top, it won't make a difference

Patently false. The fact that any taxes work is an obvious counterexample, cause in our progressive tax system they "come from the top"

Please stop! Read a book!

Well you give up quickly. Why don't you go back and find the name of your law, and then I can give you a reading list.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zipf%27s_law

"Taxes" are not taken from the richest rich as proposed by this dumb OP's post. That's why you're wrong. What a stupid comment you made!

So are you gonna shut up now? Go read a book.

Edit: Because I know you'll start barking anyway, I decided to fit the data of the top 100 billionaires to an inverse function. Now go read a book and learn how nature works.

Source of the data for 2023 billionaires: https://www.forbes.com/billionaires/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Learn to read, I said they "come from the top," not the richest. Below a certain income, we don't tax so what I said is tautologically true.

I'm familiar with Zipf's law, and what it means in this case is that if you have a distribution of people sorted by wealth, the wealthy are MUCH wealthier than the poor, or worded in the direction of the law the poorest will have money proportional to the reciprocal of the size of the population. You know what that means? It means the wealthy are THE ONLY GROUP that can bear the tax burden.

The more you insist that I should read a book, the more it sounds like you haven't read any. But keep talking, eventually you'll understand the implications of what you're saying.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude, don't tell me "you know" what Zipf law is when you questioned that whole inverse-law thing. Just shut up! Not only I shut you up by bringing it up, but I also did the math for you a fit a function for you to prove you wrong, which you, of course, won't do because you're lazy, assuming you even know how to fit data to a function. And now we're changing the goal post so that you can be right. Make a plan that's realistic, that doesn't involve taxation as it's done now maximized for the middle class, or fuck off and read a book! I've heard enough of your nonsense.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dude, don't tell me what I know when you can't get the terminology right, and can't bother to remember the name.

Oh wow! You also know how to use mathematica! To reproduce the graph on Wikipedia! I guess that means you know statistamics or whatever the name is.

Now extend your graph to people making below minimum wage. Can.you tell me where all.the tax money is going to come from? It uses calculus though, so hopefully you can be bothered to remember how integrals work (or as you probably call them, integracalc distribution functions)

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're such an idiot you didn't even understand what I did. I did a non-linear fit of the inverse law, not just a plot. But you're ignorant so you can't understand what that even means. Fuck off and read a book.

Calculus? Dude I have a PhD in physics. Calculus is children's play. But anyway, I think it's time to block you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

A non linear fit! Holy shit! Thats the same graph they have on Wikipedia! While I don't believe you have a degree past high school, your arrogance does match the physicists in grad school. Probably also explains why you think using Mathematica is impressive.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Finally, some sense! I agree that we need to close some loopholes used by the ultra-wealthy to hoard their fortunes, but the reality is that all their money is basically pocket change compared to the kinda cash the US government routinely blows on the stupidest shit imaginable.

Seriously, just take a look at how the US military spends its almost-a-trillion ANNUAL budget and you probably won’t sleep for a few nights.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds to me like we need a new system in place. So yes, let it crash and burn.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

When you say that, I assume you’re willing to live like a sub-Saharan African family for a couple years, if not a decade.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

The sad reality is that your revolutionary wish will kill millions of people in the process due to the failing economy, since no economy means no food delivery, no functioning infrastructure, etc. Well. I'm no moral judge here so it's up to you. I'm just telling you it's really expensive. Careful what you wish for.