this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
544 points (80.8% liked)

Leftism

2060 readers
5 users here now

Our goal is to be the one stop shop for leftism here at lemmy.world! We welcome anyone with beliefs ranging from SocDemocracy to Anarchism to post, discuss, and interact with our community. We are a democratic community, and as such, welcome metaposts that seek to amend the rules through consensus. Post articles, videos, questions, analysis and more. As long as it's leftist, it's welcome here!

Rules:

Posting Expectations:

Sister Communities:

[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Solarpunk memes [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You misunderstand the hypothetical. All, or nearly all, people are capable but only a few would. My point is that evil exists and to ignore it is a problem. Several people in this discussion have attempted to say that capitalism is the cause of evil. This is obviously untrue. Capitalism can enable evil, but to claim that a different economic system would eliminate evil is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Capitalism exacerbates many things, including crime, violence, and instability. From a leftist perspective, private property is given rights, which artificially increases the amount of crime statistics. If private property were abolished, the only crimes that would occur are between people. It will still happen. But most crime is committed out of desperation to meet their needs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Seriously? Do you not have the ability to understand hypotheticals?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I understand what you're saying, and disagree. I didn't say that a neighbor can't do antisocial behavior. I'm saying that you should trust your neighbors until they give you a reason not to, because your neighbors are not your enemy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are you saying that an antisocial neighbor wouldn't be the enemy?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Oh, well then. I think that's a problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What? If a neighbor has antisocial behavior towards you, they are an enemy. But that does not make your other neighbors enemies by default.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Jesus... finally.

A neighbor can be an enemy. Not all of your neighbors are enemies.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you're telling me that all of this discussion has been a series of misunderstandings? Lmao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I never misunderstood my position. I don't know how else to convey the idea that some neighbors might be enemies.... yes obviously most are fine. We should give everyone the benefit of the doubt... but the economic system doesn't fix the truly demented.