Linux

48332 readers

370 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

215

if you could standardise a file format for a specific task what would you pick and why (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

287 comments fedilink hide all child comments

if you could pick a standard format for a purpose what would it be and why?

e.g. flac for lossless audio because...

(yes you can add new categories)

summary:

photos .jxl
open domain image data .exr
videos .av1
lossless audio .flac
lossy audio .opus
subtitles srt/ass
fonts .otf
container mkv (doesnt contain .jxl)
plain text utf-8 (many also say markup but disagree on the implementation)
documents .odt
archive files (this one is causing a bloodbath so i picked randomly) .tar.zst
configuration files toml
typesetting typst
interchange format .ora
models .gltf / .glb
daw session files .dawproject
otdr measurement results .xml

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago (4 children)

JPEG-XL for rasterized images.

https://jpegxl.info/why-jxl.html

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I agree.

I especially love that it addresses the biggest pitfall of the typical "fancy new format does things better than the one we're already using" transition, in that it's specifically engineered to make migration easier, by allowing a lossless conversion from the dominant format.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Never heard of that, thanks for bringing it to my attention!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does it compare to AVIF?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AVIF is slower, has a way smaller maximum resolution and doesn't support progressive decoding as well as lossless JPEG recompression.

Comparison chart of different image codecs

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh dam, that resolution limit is a total deal breaker. Can't believe anyone would release a format with those limitations today...