this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
1020 points (98.3% liked)

Risa

6921 readers
23 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1020
Am I? Who knows (startrek.website)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Source Page. Credit is to SMBC-Comics and even more credit to @[email protected] who noticed it was missing and found the credit in this comment. Sorry about that and thanks, you're awesome aperson <3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a chapter or two from a book by philosopher Derek Parfit that tackles the transporter issue pretty head-on. It draws what I feel to be a pretty compelling distinction between the continuity of your conscious mind, referred to as Relation R, and the personal identity that is lost when using the transporter. He then asks which is more important. Worth a read if this stuff interests you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I look forward to reading it, and I will be able to enjoy certain kinds of scifi much more if it convinces me nothing is lost. Your phrasing makes me think it's just going to reinforce my general worry about that sort of tech though.

(I recognize that it's fictional, it just breaks stories with similar tech a bit for me.)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Dunno, I value my continued existence pretty highly. Maybe I'll change my mind when I read the PDF.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your continued existence isn't in question. Continuity of consciousness is an illusion. If you would put your brain state in stasis and resume it later, you wouldn't feel any different. Neither would a copied version of you. That feeling of continuity is all there is to consciousness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The copy wouldn't feel any different, but I'd be dead. The process as described in OP (and most fiction) is inherently destructive, IMO.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No you wouldn't be any deader than you will be a fraction of a second from now. You only live in the moment. In the next you are replaced by someone who is almost, but not exactly you. Continuous consciousness is an illusion, or a concept. There's no magic piece that makes you you.

It's a trick of perspective.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ok, thanks for your input!