this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
380 points (97.7% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55099 readers
202 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To add to this, not one person has jail broken a steam deck. Not because it is impossible, but because it would be pointless.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would removing the immutable aspect be, in theory, a jailbreak?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Kind of a funny "shower thought" to think about. Well if it were an iOS or Android device, the "jailbreak" is rooting since root is highest level access for *nix systems. So that is what is technically happening with the Steam Deck as you now have sudo access and most/all read-only restrictions are off. But at the same time Valve doesn't start banning your deck or punishing you for doing it, and even tell you how to do it in an FAQ on the official Steam Support page. Which means it isn't technically a "jailbreak" either and more of a "advanced settings" with some warnings and specific instructions that aren't defaultly turned on. So it is both technically "jailbreaking" and not "jailbreaking."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I would say no as it was designed to be turned off if desired to do so. If it weren't designed for that, then I would say yes.