World News

22017 readers

134 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Exclusive: WHO's cancer research agency to say aspartame sweetener a possible carcinogen - sources (www.reuters.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The IARC's decisions have also faced criticism for sparking needless alarm over hard to avoid substances or situations. It has previously put working overnight and consuming red meat into its "probably cancer-causing" class, and using mobile phones as "possibly cancer-causing", similar to aspartame.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Pickes are on the list too I think.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean... it can still be cancer causing despite being hard to avoid. If it's impossible to avoid ("breathing probably cancer-causing") then I could see the argument. But all-nighters and red meat are pretty avoidable for a sizable fraction - maybe not all - of people who are in that group.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Breathing is cancer causing. Free radicals from blood oxygenation are a source of cancer. As are free radicals from cellular metabolism.

The point is more "12-36 cans of diet soda per day to begin seeing potential health effects" is a signal to noise ratio so far removed from reality you might as well wander into the woods fully detached from the world forever.

And then worry about getting cancer from breathing in unknown fungal spores growing in the soils around you, or try to make sure you find a place to settle that has a lower than average uranium content in the rocks and soil, too.

This is the reverse of "handguns kill cancer cells in a petri dish." If you introduce so much of a compound around DNA that every other molecular interaction is your compound, eventually you'll get something to happen, that's just statistics.