this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
102 points (91.8% liked)

Technology

58012 readers
2862 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Its not super bad. $55/month per powerwall. With them running around 10-15k installed, you get roughly 20yrs out of the battery pack before you could have "bought" it for the same price. That likely lines up to effectivly 2x end of life, with most of these packs estimated to last 10yrs or so. So its really a deal at up $110/month.

Of course, it carries some issues when selling the home like leased solar. Lease to own would have been a better system, but apparently people are happy to sign up without it, so im not suprised they aren't offering it.

Overall, its a really good idea. With enough distributed battery packs, you not only gain breathing room in outages, you reduce the need to spin up dirty, expensive to maintain *baseline" load generators like coal/natural gas/etc.

You can get more and more out of renewables overall with more storage, and with powerwalls and other options, utilities now have a convient way to improve service resilience and go greener while using customers homes as energy storage. Win win.