23
The most annoying thing for me was the huge internet data usage by snap updates but it is better now.
(files.mastodon.social)
The most annoying thing for me was the huge internet data usage by snap updates but it is better now.
Even though it showed 300mb for a Firefox update, but only consumed 80mb and everything updated and working wonderfully ! π π π
The New app store is beautiful π
(just sharing my experience π )
I understand the sentiment. That said, you're forced to use deb files from Ubuntu's repositories. π« There are some fundamental choices that are made for you by the OS developers. Sometimes you have more leeway, sometimes less. It's not the first time and this isn't the only system component people have complained about. Ultimately if a user disagrees with a choice that the OS developer has made about a system upon which the OS developer depends to ship a working system, it's probably wiser to switch OSes than fuck around with the system.
You are correct. When on Ubuntu I tried to remove the entire snapd system but as soon as I ran an update it the system reinstalled it
So I immediately moved to Mint. And now that LMDE 6 became available I immediately moved to that. And I couldn't be happier. Works great.
Makes sense. I've been pretty excited about snap on desktop since 2014-15 since it promised to deliver Android-style unbreakable software update capability that finally unlocks updating parts of the system out of band and safely. I switched to snap from all the PPAs I used in 2016. GIMP, Inkscape, etc. I think I was able to get rid of the remaining PPAs in 2018. No package breakage since then, trivial OS upgrades. My main machine has been upgraded through every LTS since 14.04. It's glorious. Yes there were some bugs with snap itself and missing features, cough.. "pending update notification" ..cough, but that's par for the course for any system under development and I've never seen a real showstopper so far. Flatpak is also useful of course and I do use it but it can't do system components as far as I know.
Thank you for sharing that because you do make a great and important point about snaps, namely that they can replace unsecure PPA's with secure Snaps. That sounds like the best argument for Snaps.
Personally I didn't have a problem with the Snaps themselves, but the forcing me to use it cough... "Firefox" ....cough...
At least have Firefox in the apt repo so people have a choice. That's literally** what the Free Software movement is about: the user has the choice and power. Not the dev or even the machine.
The security sandbox provided by snap is a major point to allowing packages "from anywhere" that you don't necessarily fully trust. Like 3rd party vendor packages. The deb installer runs the package installation of debs as root and it allows them to do anything. I'm not even talking about running the software, a deb can run anything and do anything to the OS at install time. Its security model requires trusted repositories where someone gatekeeps what packages can reach your computer. Snap had the sandbox design since its inception to solve this problem. It wasn't something tacked on later.
The Firefox snap rollout was a shit show. The snap package itself had defects such as lacking important performance optimizations that were done in other snap packages for example. Then there was the update notification that bugged people to close the app only to show again if they reopened it soon after. Those were ultimately solvable problems but Canonical let them trickle into most users' desktops during an LTS release... And this was many people's first impression of snap - those few annoying bugs - even if the system has been solid and running, solving real use cases for years prior. A.k.a. a shit show.
Appreciate the heads up. I started tinkering with Ubuntu on the Pi 5, one if the first things I went about doing was removing snap, grabbing a .deb repo for Firefox and installing flatpak.
If snap is restored as part of system upgrades, I may switch back over to raspbian, or check out other distros to tinker with.
I have to say, Ubuntu on the Pi is quite nice, and Wayland is working wonderfully on it.
Yes Ubuntu is a great OS, which is why the whole snaps thing was so sad. Everyone already loves Ubuntu and uses it, why force snaps on users? Have both snaps and flatpak and let the user have the freedom to use both.
Simply makes no sense to ban fkatpak support out of the box and make users do it manually. Why? The flavours were adding flatpak support for the convenience of the user which is great, but canonical said they had to stop doing that or else they cannot be an Ubuntu flavour anymore.
Very strong handed mafia style bullshit that doesn't belong in FREE SOFTWARE.
Well, they probably compile everything from source after doing a full security audit of the code, right? π« π«
As much as the snap packaged code. Line by line audits with formal proofs. π«
This fascination with snap being somehow fundamentally different from the deb repos situation is weird.
I can get debs from other sources, I can add non Ubuntu repos to my apt list. I can download a deb and unpack it to see whatβs in it. But thatβs not really my issue, I donβt want everything containerized in a proprietary format. I am currently using a different distro because of this but having used Ubuntu since 4.10 I have a pretty long relationship with the distro.
@avidamoeba @Dagamant
Well said.