this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
1578 points (96.6% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53843 readers
667 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

wow just wow while i can't say i didn't see this one coming but it always amazes me where greed could lead someone

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The best reasoning I saw for this change was for clarity for non native English speakers. If you're learning the language "allowlist" is definitely more clear in meaning than "whitelist"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not really, at least in Spanish we’ve always said “listas blancas/listas negras”.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I don't know what you are talking about.

Even if our dialects (Mexican) didn't have vestigial racism and fake dichotomies, permitir y bloquear is as straight forward as you can get.

IT switched from white/black literally years ago, if your department didn't, you are quite stuck in time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure... But unless you know what either of those terms means, it's just gibberish like ping.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Glad fizzbuzz doesn't fit into the gibberish category