this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
21 points (100.0% liked)
Mildly Interesting
17298 readers
286 users here now
This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.
This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?
Just post some stuff and don't spam.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah - electrically, antenna has broader bandwidth, and mechanically, it's harder to ding it. Broader bandwidth also means that tolerances aren't that critical. Downside is increased weight and wind loading
This specific antenna was used for video downlink, which requires comparatively large bandwidth
Additionally, for frequencies that were practical at that time you can't use simple Yagi, because this would mean choppy signal. Instead you need circular polarization - and that requires either crossed pairs of rods, but this is narrowband, or rings, but this is flimsy and still narrowband but not as badly, or disks. You could ditch these elements entirely and use long helix only (bottom part but extended) but helix has quickly diminishing returns - this design takes good properties of both of these