this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

Francophone

412 readers
1 users here now

All instance rules apply :

English allowed, but try to speak French, no one will judge you.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hmm pour moi rudimentaire veut dire moins poli plutôt qu'inférieur, je ne pense pas que ce soit la même chose ? Ou je suis encore en train de malmener la langue ?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry for speaking English but my French is not enough to speak about this topic. As far as I'm aware, rudimentary means too basic, without enough tools or options. That is what I understood.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Lol. I'm learning so I was struggling for vocab anyway.

As far as I’m aware, rudimentary means too basic, without enough tools or options. That is what I understood.

It's the "too" I was disagreeing with. I was meaning rudimentary in the sense of "basic; having limitations to options". However limited options isn't necessarily inferior, it's just less polished. Rustic even.

I'm hoping it's not another faux-ami and I'm thinking the English meaning is the same as the French incorrectly

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~Poli is not polished but polite. That was the faux ami.~~

^ faux