European Graphic Novels+
“BD” refers to Franco-Belgian comics, but let's open things up to include ALL Euro comics and GN's. Euro-style work from around the world is also welcome!
* BD = "Bandes dessinées"
* BDT = Bedetheque
* GN = graphic novel
* LBK = Lambiek
* LC = "Ligne claire"
Please DO: 1) follow good 'netiquette' and 2) the four simple rules of lemm.ee (this instance) when posting and commenting. As for extracts, they're fine, but don't link to pirated downloads.
MODERATION: If you happen to make a mistake upon the above, then please don't worry about it. We'll likely just laugh it off and let you know. OTOH, obvious bad-faith and hostile efforts will not be tolerated here.
For posting tips, including how to handle NSFW and personal content, see the FAQ below.
The designated language here is English, with a traditional bias towards French. When posting foreign-language content, please DO include helpful context for English-speakers.
---> Here's the community F.A.Q, and our resource page <---
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
- #bandes dessinées
- r/bandedessinee
- [email protected]
- Comics on Lemmy
- GN's on Lemmy
- Heathcliff (w/o HC)
- r/noDCnoMarvel
- Moebius_Art
- Moomin Valley
SEARCHES:
# #Tintin #Asterix #LuckyLuke #Spirou #Gaston #CortoMaltese #Thorgal #Sillage(Wake) #Smurfs #Trondheim #Moebius #Jodorowsky
view the rest of the comments
Agreed, I would even go as far as saying that writing a prompt can not be art, no matter how well written. I tend to think so, because the process of AI image generation is so complex, that while it is not actually random, in practice the process is a black box to the person writing the prompt. That makes the process virtually non-deterministic from the prompt-writers perspective. Thus writing a prompt is closer to guessing around and choosing the best of the random results, then to actually creating something, based on ones own creative vision. If at all the results are created based on the creative vision of the artists the AI was trained on and in the process those artists visions have been put into a blender and mixed into a non recognizable pulp.
I could not have said it better but I am also sure in the future, people who do nothing more than writing prompts, will start labeling themselves "prompt artists". However, what I could actually respect as a form of art, would be a person or collective, which develops their own AI, codes it by themselves, then personally chooses certain material to train the AI on (with consent of the creators instead of just auto crawling the web for random images) and then writes prompts for it. Compared to just prompt writing, this method would require serious effort in what I would call proper craftsmanship and even more important, the process would become more deterministic, so the results would be significantly based on the prompt writers creative vision instead of a seemingly random process.
I am not worried about that, just think of music made with acoustic instruments, vinyl records, analog tube guitar amplifiers and so on. The good stuff usually stays around no matter what new stuff gets invented, sure a technology might lose it's cultural dominance but will stay state of the art for the connoisseurs and often some time after that, when people get tired with the new stuff, it even has a mainstream revival.
Edit: There is already a counter movement, check this out: This new data poisoning tool lets artists fight back against generative AI
Thanks for the link. Data obfuscation seems like a noble effort, altho way too easy to work around in the end. Or maybe that's just my cynical take, haha.
I like your idea of an artist using a self-generative type of AI to create custom art. I *think*. I mean, I'm still not very happy about the whole situation, but your idea makes the most sense to me. Far better than the current situation, anyway.
You're probably right. I think I just wanted to bitch and moan, today! >(
No problem man, just let it out!