this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
124 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37585 readers
302 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And it’s really responsive even on battery. It’s actually a little bad because I can have too many windows open and can’t find anything.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (2 children)

MacOS doesn't throttle performance on battery like many Windows power plans do, that's why

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Well it can when it needs to. It just doesn't need to much

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

MacOS doesn't need to throttle performance because ARM and other RISC architectures are naturally very power efficient

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They didn't do it on x86 either I believe.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Well those Intel CPUs used to thermal throttle anyway in their outlandishly inadequate cooling designs so they did not need to throttle power either way. Now they could throttle power but don't have to