this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
1231 points (98.4% liked)
Murdered by Words
1533 readers
1 users here now
Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.
The following things are not grounds for murder:
- Personal appearance ("You're fat", "You're ugly")
- Posts with little-to-no context
- Posts based on a grammar/spelling error
- Dick jokes, "Yo mama", "No, you" type responses and other low effort insults
- "Your values are bad" without any logcal or factual ways of showing that they are wrong ("I believe in capitalism" - "Well, then you must be evil" or "Fuck you you ignorant asshole")
Rules:
- Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
- Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
- No bigotry of any kind.
- Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
- If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
- Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
It's really surprising that Musk has not eliminated the "Readers added context" feature. Yet.
It's been used by a lot of his bootlickers to his advantage. But I'm sure it will be on the chopping block if people start using it against him.
An annoying thing about authoritarians and right-wingers is that the context doesn't matter. People trying to have a rational discussion care, but reactionaries trolling on twitter are trying to inflict damage.
It's not that it doesn't matter, it's that by the time people add context, the people that need that context already saw the tweet and move on with their life thinking that musk "owned" Wikipedia.
Its only us fuckers that don't follow him that get these tweets with context included.
The issue with the context is that people don't really search for old tweets, they either see it live or, sadly, read a screen capture of the tweet. If that capture was taken pre context, it doesn't matter what users say, the twee lt will be spread as-is.
That's a good point about the 'liveness' of the tweet I didn't think about. I'm not on twitter so most tweets I see are screencaps, taken at the time of posting usually probably, for all I know tweets I see could be fake altogether hah. This feature is great for their business in more ways then, it makes it look like they care about the truthfulness of what is spread on the site, but still allows for uninformed propagandizing.
Not that I've seen.
It will be next on the chopping block after this.
Or you’ll have to pay to add context.