Asklemmy

43816 readers

923 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Do you think lemmy will sustain scalability? (lemmus.org)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not just speaking technically but economically. As user number mount up their post is just going to add up. I know instaces may distribute user, but server space isn't going to go down for anyone. It just seems like built to fall.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I'm running an instance, on local home fiber that I'm already paying for (30€/m around 700Mb up for real, 2x2.5Gb down theoretical) so no problem today, at all.

Don't make the error thinking today's tech will linger, we will most probably have better and cheaper hardware in the future, but also smarter algorithms dealing with it all, remember it's a first try and can only get better.