Technology

58094 readers

3176 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

177

The AI Politicians Would Like to Speak With You Now - Politicians are using AI doppelgängers to reach voters. It’s a trend that’s about to explode. (gizmodo.com)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Over the last month, some Spanish-speaking New Yorkers got a recorded phone call from Mayor Eric Adams speaking their native language. “Hola, soy el alcalde Eric Adams,” the mayor says in a monotone but flawless accent, before launching into a pitch for jobs with the city government. The truth is Adams isn’t multilingual, but he is a pioneer in the AI politics race.

In October, the mayor’s office said he’s been using AI to blast his constituents with millions of robocalls in languages he doesn’t speak, including Yiddish, Spanish, Mandarin, Haitian Creole, and Cantonese.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Maybe I’m old fashioned, but I would be offended to get an AI robocall from a politician, and it would make me less likely to vote for them, even if they were from the party I support.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Even if that politician called me personally I would feel this way. This is a statement about robocalls more than about AI.

However if they had a ChatGPT style interface for asking them in depth policy questions that would answer as they would answer, I would be all fucking in. That would be awesome.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago

Except it wouldn’t. It would tell you what they calculated that you wanted to hear—just like they do in debates.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago

This is my approach to sms spam as well, it makes my ballot much faster to fill out: I vote for whoever didn’t spam me

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It's because it is an insult to your intelligence.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago

Yep "I spent zero effort on you and I think you're stupid enough to feel special about a robocall"

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Right now it's not as bad, but soon we wont be able to tell whether robocalls are humans or not.

I guess we can resort to having the one on the other line say stuff they shouldn't be able to as an AI (I.E the classic "say penis x3 if you are human")

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I think I’d be able to tell it was fake if Ted Cruz rang to call me by name and give me a message in Swahili, no matter how convincing his tone may be.