this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2023
177 points (98.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43889 readers
1506 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Will that not just result in a terrible camera...? O.o

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Surprisingly no

Such scanners can scan at incredibly high resolution

Hundreds of Megapixels in fact

The main thing the time it takes to scan the image is quite high, like 30 seconds or do

Edit: Here's an example photo from someone who did what I'm talking about.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That's actually pretty fascinating, thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Wow, that's beautiful. Best of luck!