this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
130 points (98.5% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5289 readers
509 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
130
In early 2029, Earth will likely lock into breaching key warming threshold, scientists calculate (apnews.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The more I see reports like this the more, hopeless I feel. Sometimes, I get to a point where I'm not even depressed but deeply numb by the catastrophe that is happening. Mass insanity we see, mass insanity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My knee jerk reaction to this has always been to say that these individual actions are inconsequential compared to what mega corporations and multinational companies are doing to pump the majority of pollution into our environment.

But I no longer think that .... I think you are correct.

If we all collectively did this ... If we all or the majority of us followed through with everything you suggested, it would have a major effect with the economy ... if it has an effect on the economy it would affect corporations ... and if it affects corporations, they lose power and are forced to produce less or even die off.

Corporations exist because of our small collective contributions ... the things we buy, the services we purchase, the things we consume ... if we collectively stop doing all that or cut it down significantly, it would starve the beast. In an economy of perpetual growth, even just a tiny dip caused by less consumption would be enough to destabilize a major corporation.

If we all just simply bought less or just ate less .... it would kill off so many useless corporations.

I've come around to your logic and I eat less, consume less and completely avoid fast food.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.facebook.com/groups/walmartdeals

i think your first line is the most correct. you can prove me wrong by convincing everyone in that facebook group that actually they should do what you said.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I don't have any power over anyone, nor do I want to ... I only have power over myself