this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
494 points (79.1% liked)

memes

9616 readers
3131 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

CloudConvert.com might as well be my fucking home page.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 80 points 10 months ago (2 children)

People just really need to support it. It's far better than jpg or png. It's the go-to for web right now, that's for sure.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Not better than jpegXL which has clearer free licensing.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Only Apple supports this. Like, literally just Apple. I hate Chrome, and even Chrome doesn't support this. Firefox? Yeah, zero support.

So for these reasons it's 100% not viable right now. If you get the support, I'll consider it for my websites, and tell my colleagues about it, though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Firefox supports JXL just fine and chrome did support it, but pulled support shortly after.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is the source I used to originally validate my position: https://caniuse.com/jpegxl

Let me know if it's incorrect, I'd be very interested to learn of new options for the web space as a developer. This said, I googled Firefox and it came back with only "experimental support" for what I think may be an alpha release (version number ends in "a").

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I think you still need to enable JXL in the config, but it seems to display just fine once enabled.

Adding support for JXL in windows was much more of a hassle and doesn't always display properly in the file preview. Hopefully windows follows Apple's step soon and adds native support.

I guess as a Web developer it won't matter until the JXL toggle is enabled by default though.

[–] balderdash9 -5 points 10 months ago (3 children)

But why is it better? My experience is clicking on webp format opens in browser instead of my image viewer

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Webp supports 24 - bit RGB w 8 - bit Alpha channel. It also has better lossless and lossly compression. And it handles transparency and animation better than other formats at a smaller size.

It is smaller, better, and faster.

[–] balderdash9 8 points 10 months ago

I wish everyone would get on the same page so it would also be better for the end user.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

People just really need to support it.

This right here sir. You missed this part.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I haven't seen a single browser that didn't support webp

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Lots of image viewers and media programs/apps dont support it currently. Which is a hassle when you've downloaded a webp and cant view or edit it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like you need upgrade your image viewer? Everything else is loading it fine.

[–] balderdash9 1 points 10 months ago

I use FastStone Image Viewer. Maybe there's a plug-in I need to install?