this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
136 points (97.2% liked)

Apple

17607 readers
40 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hoping the 15 Pro will be great for battery. Seems like 12 and 14 took steps back in battery, 13 was great and hopefully 15 will be as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 years ago (6 children)

It's mind-blowing how slow the advance of batteries is compared to every other kind of technology

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

I mean sure, but it’s also kind of the opposite. Energy density has increased dramatically from lead acid technologies.

The real issue is you’re not going to leave leftover power untapped, so the tech will always exceed the battery as they try to leech every last drop of power from the system.

Sorta like an energy chicken and an egg situation.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Not every other kind of technology though. I think the problem is that batteries get lumped in the same category as "modern tech" (e.g., microchips and storage), rather than with energy tech.

For example, Wikipedia says a poat-war VW bug got around 35mpg. That's similar to the combined mileage of a Civic that's 50 years newer. Yes, the Civic is more powerful and weighs more


but we're not talking Moore's law improvements.

Same if you look at power. A 1967 Corvette 427 was listed at 430 horsepower; a modern base Vette is 490 (or 670 for the Z06). Sure, the mileage is way better, etc., but again, hardly Moore's law improvements.

Energy and power are tricky.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The 67 was measured with no accessories or load. It would be about 350 bhp today. It also had ledded fuel that would be like running on only e85 and with no cat today. If you had that the Z06 would be well over 1000 hp with the old rating.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago

Battery tech has the limitations of chemistry to deal with. A ton of cutting-edge work is being done with exotic materials, but it needs to be ready for the mass market before we see any groundbreaking improvements.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Yeah, until they make a new kind of battery it will stay that way

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The huge battery advancements have been cost to build them. I think a Tesla roadster was around a thousand dollars per kilowatt. A model three is under 100 per kilowatt now.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

But the underlying technology has not changed much, if at all. The Tesla battery is nothing more than what is a bunch of Li-Ion battery cells wired together.