this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1510 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

57455 readers
4422 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 37 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Bandwagoning. The narrative is so easy to spin "hey the evil board of directors forced our beloved CEO to leave. If they do that to /US/ we need to do it back to /them/.

I think that would get most people with moral concerns on board, the rest are just tech bros and would fully support a money grubbing unethical CEO if they thought they might get a bigger bonus out of it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, isn’t this just an attempt to instil democracy in their workplace? If the vast majority of employees want something, whether or not it is objectively in their best interest, shouldn’t leadership listen to them? Isn’t this just what unions do on the regular?

I have no dog in this fight, I don’t know who’s a good person and who’s bad, but I believe in democracy even when it doesn’t produce the best result. I wish all companies acted upon the wishes of their employees rather than their shareholders, customers or consumers; that would make for far more cohesive and productive workplaces.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Democracy works best when the people voting are well informed. I'm saying it seems like people have been manipulated by a very easy "us vs them" narrative to get the lower employees on board with the wishes of the upper management. And if you poised the question of "what direction should the company take, to pursue ethical AI or to try and make profitable AI" or something similar you probably would get different results.

Also this isn't really democracy in the work place just people attaching their names to a letter. Of which I'm betting most didn't even read themselves.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but the answer to a lack of an informed public is not reverting away from democracy; it’s trying to inform the voters. Very many people vote against their best interests on a regular basis in a political sphere, and we shouldn’t revoke their right to vote as a result. Democracy, as a principle, should still prevail.

I don’t think it’s fair to infantilise people you’ve never met in the way that you are. What evidence do you have that the people who signed on to this letter didn’t read it? What evidence do you have that they’re either naïve or easily manipulated? I think they’re unfair assumptions. They may be true, but I have no idea if that’s the case.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

I'm working on the assumption that the people working at the company are a fairly typical example of the general population.

So I'm applying my experiences of people in general to them. It's would be like assuming they didn't read a software licence because most people don't do that. And I know from previous experience that people would get an email asking them to put their name to this letter and would opt to do so based on their existing opinions, and wouldn't take the time to actually read it. Of course some people did, but I think it's a safe assumption to say most didn't.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I too think all the people I disagree with are simply stupid and ill-informed, as that is truly the highest form of intellectual integrity

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not at all what I'm saying but go off.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Whatever I'm betting you didn't even fully read my comment. You're obviously not informed or are being manipulated. Maybe if someone just explained it to you differently you'd understand what my comment says and support it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes take lemmy comments very seriously, get into fights with strangers on the internet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I literally just quoted you. lol

Mom and Dad aren't fighting, Squirt, we're just talking about something very exciting!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not at all. But keep pouring salt over a lemmy comment if it helps you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

No fun allowed on lemmy!