this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
375 points (75.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26788 readers
3438 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How? They were not in Gaza until the war began. In addition, there is the sea.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

IDF ships shoot anything that strays too far from the coast, and the guards don't have to be in the cells to have people imprisoned

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I am not aware of that fact. Are there any laws/incidents which would prohibit normal ships from leaving the area?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

laws? it's internationally illegal, but that doesn't matter, hence all the UN resolutions that Israel ignores.

incidents? sure, here's an article from a few years ago of an incident that got somewhat prominent outside the region, it's just that no one cares if the IDF blows a few brown fishermen out of the water (hell outside the English publication of a few prominent Hebrew papers people wouldn't even know that Netanyahu was aiding Hamas to stay in power)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well yes, you cannot just let a ship go to Gaza because of the possibility of bringing even more weapons there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

dude, the import restrictions are ad hawk, nonsense and seemingly change every week, this isn't about weapons it's about trying to starve them out

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is a complete nonsense. If Israel wanted, they could have starved Gaza far sooner and would not play with them for 80 years.

In addition, we can theoretically consider Israel the biggest Gaza supporters because they give them electricity and water for free. No Arab country does that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

it really isn't, the only thing keeping them from going full on holocaust on the Palestinians is international pressure, because Israel exists at "the pleasure of the west" in general.

Ironically, the only reason Gaza doesn't have their own Power and Water production is because Israel bombed it a long time ago and refuses to let it be fixed, because the bibi government uses it as a tool to influence Gaza, hilariously to support Hamas.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Regarding the power plant: it has 4 operational units but ran out of fuel as it was diesel powered. I have seen some information that Hamas has diesel as one of its resources but that was only reported by an Israeli media, hence it cannot be trusted.

It is debatable whether they would go "full holocaust" on Gaza without international pressure. However, I personally know some people who would support that and also certain right-wing parties want a complete siege of Palestine. I strongly disagree with this rhetoric. On the other hand, some political subjects support negotiations.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

you do realize that the current ruling powers in Israel consist in part of literally anti-Muslim terrorists who have dedicated their lives, and publically call for the historic Jewish homeland (from the Euphrates to the Red Sea) to be cleansed of Muslims and retaken for the Jewish people, they literally mirror Nazi rhetoric, (and ironically call holocaust survivors that disagreed with them antisemites), and the other calling for a full on apartheid state and for territorial expansion via annexation.

As for the idea that the Gaza power plant would just be out of fuel, that contradicts any number of local reports from various NGOs and even the UN, and judging by the Israeli track record in the area i will believe the other sources over them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Israel is a democratic country (check democracy index) and there is a freedom of religion. 18.7% of population are Muslim, so Israel is definitely not against Islam. The comparison to Nazis is literally funny because Arab people (usually Muslims) have exactly the same rights as Jews. In addition, Israel is not an apartheid state. Some argue they perform apartheid on the Palestinian people but those under a different administration. By this logic, every state can be considered apartheid because citizens of that state have in that state more rights than non-citizens. That’s standard.

Mind showing any sources about the power plant? Wikipedia was reporting that all 4 generators were fine.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Some argue they perform apartheid on the Palestinian people but those under a different administration. By this logic, every state can be considered apartheid because citizens of that state have in that state more rights than non-citizens. That’s standard.

most of the world isn't the sovereign in control of the other countries, nor do Americans just annex towns in Canada every few weeks

Democracy index? which one? the economist? they don't care much about things like civil rights, as long as the majority of the population can vote, the government can enact + Radicalize legislation, if you actually looked up the methodology of the ranking (remember other nations in the same ranking as Israel still have legislation making being LGBT+ illegal and other such things)

18.7% of the population? that's less than the Armenians in Turkey.

and lastly, on the apartheid regime; if multiple Israeli human rights NGOs, the UN-HRC, Amnesty int., HRW, and even the Israeli supreme court have said it is an apartheid regime then maybe it is.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

18.7% of the population is a considerable amount of people. In the country I live in, the biggest "minority" is less than 7%.

The apartheid is debatable though. I know that European commission stated that Israel is not an apartheid regime. Israeli judiciary also does not say that the country is apartheid.

However, the Supreme court of Israel and UN decided that Israel illegally occupies land in the west bank, so there cannot be an excuse/counter argument for that.

may I ask what you mean by LGBTI+ rights? If I remember correctly, Israel is quite good in these terms (Not as good as some eňEuropean countries but far better than rest of middle east)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The point of the LGBT+ thing was pointing out that the definition of "democracy" the Economist uses, doesn't include civil rights (tho if you want to start comparing the treatment of LGBTQ+ people Israel isn't even the best in the M.east).

as for 18.7% being a considerable amount of people, thus can't be apartheid state is a massive nothingburger seeing as we have seen genocides happen to larger groups.

and in context of the European commission, I recommend you read their actual answer, because the "Israel is not an apartheid state" bit is politics, read the rest, and it's basically admitting that the Israeli state clearly disregards the civil rights of group/s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

What other middle eastern country is better in terms of LGBTI rights than Israel? Lgbti rights are not ideal there but they allow registered partnerships and even recognize same sex marriages performed elsewhere. In addition, Tel Aviv is one of the most gay-friendly cities in the world with some additional rights for LGBTI people.

I agree that we have seen genocide happening to larger groups than 18.7% but those 18.7% in arabs are nowhere near genocide. Arabs with Israeli citizenship have the same rights as Jews living there. They are members of the supreme court, they have a political party, etc.

I have checked the article and I agree it points out some mistakes made by Israel towards Palestinians but those actions cannot be considered apartheid. Yes, they illegally build settlements in an undisputed land but that’s not apartheid.