this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
204 points (99.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5239 readers
288 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
204
UN criticises 'severe' Just Stop Oil sentences (www.bbc.com)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
31 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I guess it depends on the level of disruption. Standing in the street is a little different from dismantling a bridge for example.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

But if you can dismantle a bridge without hurting anyone, and do so in protest of something, that’d be impressive and should be allowed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I agree it'd be impressive. But is making thousands of people drive more hours every day due to increased congestion hurting them? In the US, most people wouldn't have another option than to just sit in traffic much longer.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

I think making people rethink what they "don't have another option" for would be a great reason to disruptively protest something. Like in protest of cars, a bunch of people block the roads only allowing public transit through. Do that long enough, maybe you can people to realize nearly all shortcomings of public transit are caused by underfunding, which is caused by all the money going to car infrastructure.

But of course looking at that from a different perspective would fucking suck, if you're a single parent, working 3 low-wage jobs, and you just want to get to work so you can afford to feed your child next week.... and then some idiots are impeding you getting to work.

But on the other other hand, maybe if the idiots were successful, you'd be able to get to work without owning a car, and you'd be able to work less, not having to pay for a car, gas, insurance, and maintenance. Ultimately improving your life... but only if they're successful. And in the meantime...

/shrug