this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
173 points (95.3% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
636 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] MrBusiness 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Played through it multiple times now and still not a fan of the Silverhand story. Would've much rather kept Jackie throughout.

Like if V and Jackie kept rising and either rolled together or became adversaries in the end

[โ€“] PancakeBrock 7 points 1 year ago

That would of been great. I just hated being torn out of V's story and having to do the Johnny stuff. I'm usually pretty busy and have started disliking games with long unskipable cut scenes because I just want to zone out and play something for a minute. That's all the silver hand parts felt like to me was a cutscene.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

100% this. Jackie and Misty were the only characters I really liked in the game and you loose them very early on