this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
51 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37730 readers
425 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

🤖 I'm a bot that provides automatic summaries for articles:

Click here to see the summaryNHS England has maintained that the FDP competition has been fair and open since it began in April last year.

However, he noted that newly created Integrated Care Systems, the main intended users of the FDP, have already started buying their own technology and will be free to continue to use it.

Others have raised concerns about vendor lock-in, given the potential difficulty of moving data off Palantir's platform and into another system should the NHS decide to change providers.

In summer, the National Data Guardian, Dr Nicola Byrne, said: "People want to understand the arrangements to ensure the NHS does not find itself locked into a relationship with any specific vendor.

The consequences of which can include rising costs, no redress against inadequate performance, and prohibitive charges for changes.

People want to be assured that the NHS will maintain control and that its own workforce will continue to upskill in digital, data and technology."


Saved 79% of original text.