this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
241 points (95.8% liked)

World News

32368 readers
696 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

"we were justified in bombing the hospital because there was a Hamas tunnel there" is genocide colonialist propaganda to justify a war crime.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

That wasn't what was being said. The point he was making was that Israel thought that they could make that accusation safely because they thought that they knew there would be tunnels they could show off because they built them.

No source for this, so grain of salt, but I've heard that the deal with the US for backing their attack on the hospital was that if no tunnels were found, Israel would have to agree to a ceasefire.

A lot of political capital was burned in America with the outcome of that attack on Al-Shifa.

Finally, just to be clear, fuck white supremacist apartheid ethno-states.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I read the comments as the opposite. There is no hamas tunnels, only an Israeli built tunnel and IDF is going to use that to justify bombing a hospital because it's an easy excuse to war crime.

[–] xerazal 2 points 1 year ago

Israel do love them some war crimes

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So did some human rights organization say that there are no tunnels or what? I have no idea how your comment relates to my question.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There was a thread here like a week ago about how there was evidence against tunnels being under the hospital.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They seem to be on the hospital grounds (or so the reports I've read seem ro indicate), which sounds to me that it not directly under the hospital building, though it is still partly under rubble so dunno really. Which ties up to my original question that what report is this that op is talking about and what is the argument.