this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
64 points (98.5% liked)

Canada

7188 readers
319 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Alberta Premier Danielle Smith confirmed the her plan to invoke the Sovereignty Act on Your Province Your Premier on Saturday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Alberta is about to create a federal constitutional challenge, and find out that they are, despite the conservatives' collective pipe dream, part of Canada.

I can already hear the chorus of "this is a gross overreach of federal power" and "Trudeau is a dictator" whines coming from the usual culprits. And the base gets riled up even further...

It's starting to become ever more tempting to, at some point, actually give them that freedom they so desperately want and defederate Alberta from Canada. I give them about as long as California was actually independent for before they come begging to be let back in, after they come to the realization that they are a land-locked nation that depends on its neighbors and existing trade relationships and agreements to sell any of their precious oil to the world.

Be careful what you wish for wild roses, you just might get it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

separation would require a referendum, which would have 0% chance of passing. nobody wants this, beside some whackos. this is all posturing by the UCP, both to their base and to the federal government.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

I know seperation is not popular enough to actually make it happen, but what I don;t understand is why this point gets brought up so much by the UCP if it isn't popular enough to actually happen. If a politician/party is constantly harping about something I don't actually support, why would I vote for them? It makes no sense.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

The only reason it "requires" a referendum is because Quebec went for that option in 1980, there's nothing anywhere setting the separation process in stone, so technically a referendum isn't necessary.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think they would instead beg for the US to let them join the Union if a Republican was in power at the time.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What does it take to admit a new state? Please tell me this couldn't happen, I don't want to be American.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Really, that's it? Damn. I bet we'd be a blue state, though, so maybe that's a disincentive for that particular weird post-2016 thing.

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your voting record over the last century says otherwise.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

You whippersnappers and not understanding the social credit party!! Why, in my day...

Sure, we're a conservative province in Canada, but in the US we'd still be to the left. We, overall, like having free healthcare and access to abortion. I swear the rest of Canada thinks we're illiterate sometimes. Bro, I saw what happened in Ontario, get off your high horse.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Alberta has the record for the longest time with the same party in power, it was a conservative party from 1971 to 2015 and they beat the previous record that they previously held that was another conservative party from 1935 to 1971.

Alberta's NDP is conservative compared to the NDP everywhere else!

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Alberta and America have both changed a lot in the past decades. The rural areas would probably still be (light?) red, but most of the population is in Calgary and Edmonton, and they're not going to go for no-joke Republicans that think the election was faked by a global cabal of pedophiles.

The Alberta NDP is a bit like the Liberals in other places, I'd say.

I'd argue that SoCred wasn't conservative. It was anti-capitalist, for one thing; although it wasn't really socialist either, but kind of it's own thing.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Who's the ~~prime minister~~ premier of Alberta? What % of the total vote did her party get?

I rest my case.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

We don't have a prime minister. Our premier won by just 1300 (well-placed, it'd be more if they were outside of Calgary) votes in a province of 4 million. I rest my case.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The title is the same in french, sorry about that

That's a lot more than 1300 votes. Maybe your province leans towards the far right more than you want to admit, 52.63% of the popular vote going to a COVID denier that called those who got vaccinated Nazis and lied about having first Nation ancestry, that doesn't look good to me...

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

No, I was pretty involved, so I'm sure about this. I was told 1309, to be exact, distributed across the close Calgary ridings.

In rural areas, it wasn't even close, so that drives up the UCP numbers quite a bit. People are crazy loyal to anything labeled "conservative" out in the boonies, it's not even a question of policy (which is why they'd vote Republican). Still, if you look at the popular vote numbers, 52.6% isn't exactly a landslide. The NDP were a hair from winning.

As for the far right, that stuff is brewing up in conservative parties all over the Western world. I seem to remember leaving bodies in dumps being the centerpoint of the Manitoba campaign, and the leading party federally is full of MPs that supported the trucker convoy. That's not an excuse, but I think it's a stretch to say that because people narrowly voted Danielle Smith in, they'd be okay not having government healthcare, which I can't imagine a Republican candidate would abide.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Don't even argue with this asshole. His entire history is nothing but arguing all the time and taking a contrary position.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You're mixing the way first past the post works with popular votes (which is the important part of this discussion), that's two separate things and you should know it if you were involved as you mentioned. One shows the opinion of the population as a whole, the other shows the opinion of the majority of separate districts.

The NDP wasn't even close to the conservatives, they were 8.6% behind in popular support. 1300 is the difference required to switch enough districts to the NDP so they would have won, it still would have meant that they would have taken power with less than 45% of the total vote and with the second position going to a party with 8% more popular support than them.

If your three kids want to go see movie A and you and your wife want to go see movie B and you tell them "Well, we're paying so we're going to see Movie B" it doesn't mean your family was leaning towards seeing Movie B, it means the parents had disproportionate power to decide which movie the family was going to see.

That's what happens with first past the post, have 45 districts voting at 100% for Party A, 55 districts each individually voting at 35% for party A and 65% for party B, party B is now in power with 35.75% of the popular vote and 55 seats, party A has 45 seats and 64.25% of the popular vote.

Alberta leans conservative, the popular vote is the proof of that.

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Alberta has first past the post.

Yes, Alberta leans conservative. I of course can't prove it, but I expect if suddenly in an environment with a centerline much further to the right, it would lean left. That's all I'm saying.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Smith would be in the Republican party if we were in the US and she would be one of the MAGA COVID deniers libertarian wackos and she got over 50% of the vote, I think you need to start facing reality...

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hey, you don't even live here, how would you know the reality better than me?

Plus, you're not even presenting new information at this point, you're just repeating what you're arguing for.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm presenting statistical facts, no need to live where you are to interpret those and guess what, we are able to find articles about Smith, it's not 1923 anymore even if 52% of Albertan electors would like it to be!

[โ€“] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No you're not. I think this conversation is done at this point, unless you can bring something fresh.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I'm not presenting statistical facts? Dude... Are you saying the election results are fake or something?

[โ€“] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

PRIME MINISTER OF ALBERTA?? lol...

Clearly a Danielle Smith supporter because you don't know anything and wouldn't dare let your lack of knowledge stop you from talking out your ass.

I'm shocked at how stupid your comment is.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

That's a little over the top. Or was that the point?

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

In french the title is the same, guess we can ignore everything I said because I made a mistake in her title! ๐Ÿ˜ฑ

So no, I'm not a Smith supporter, far from it.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

So you're blaming the French title instead of admitting not knowing her actual title?

Yeah, I'll ignore everything you ever say going forward as you clearly do not care about being accurate.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, French is my first language and I just assumed that since we use the same title for both positions at the provincial and federal level in French it was the same in English.

I'm sure you would never ever make a mistake when speaking your second language and would hope that people would just consider your have no credibility on any subject if you ever did, I mean, that sounds completely fair, right?

What's funny is that while you're arguing about me making a mistake about her title you're ignoring the fact that I pointed out, Smith got more than 50% of the popular vote in a very recent election and she's much closer to the current Republicans than from the historic progressive conservatives of both Canada's and Alberta's past.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

There you go.. you made an assumption from ignorance which makes your message suspect at best. What else are you willing to assume? How Danielle Smith of you.

Whatโ€™s funny is that while youโ€™re arguing about me making a mistake about her title youโ€™re ignoring the fact that I pointed out, Smith got more than 50% of the popular vote in a very recent election and sheโ€™s much closer to the current Republicans than from the historic progressive conservatives of both Canadaโ€™s and Albertaโ€™s past.

You think that's funny? What exactly is funny about that? Or do you mean something other than 'funny' because you know, 'ESL is my excuse 'du jour'?'

I'm looking forward to your next excuse for your poor behaviour.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

No, I absolutely meant funny, you're trying to derail the discussion by insulting me for something that is simply an honest mistake. What's funny to me is that the only person that looks like a Smith supporter here is you because it seems like you don't want to talk about the situation of politics in Alberta so you would rather try to discredit me instead.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Keep assuming from nothing. Clearly you think it's working for you.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean... You're the one arguing against EV cars by pulling arguments out of your ass...

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Was I arguing against EV's? Really?

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They aren't even close to perfect because an **EV puts out 2x more CO2 during the manufacturing process and it takes A LOT of driving to make up the difference**. Still better than nothing but EV's will not work for me as I barely drive and 'driving more' isn't a solution, it's more of a problem.

A lie right out of the anti EV movement handbook.

Yes, you were.

[โ€“] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You think that's me arguing against EV's? Jesus dude, grow a brain.

I simply said EV's are more polluting from the factory and driving more to break even isn't a solution.

I know English is your second language but are you really going to argue with someone who's first language is English?

Nothing I said was a lie and I'm not arguing against EV's, even if a keyboard warrior like you says so.

Try again smooth brain.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"Nothing I said is a lie" he said right after being shown a quote of him lying.

Yeah... So I'll just send you off to the block list now because clearly you're just unable to admit you might have been wrong and having a discussion with people like you just makes everyone a bit more stupid.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 11 months ago

Just because you say I'm lying doesn't mean I'm lying. You're such an idiot.