this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2023
96 points (100.0% liked)
Sydney
928 readers
26 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I don't understand; why do this? If someone gains a "better" view, then isn't it blindingly obvious who cut them down?
That's probably not enough to hold up in court. They could be getting framed by a competitor builder. The trees might have been accidentally cut (eg a contractor misinterpreting the location). All sorts of things.
You don't accidentally chop down 300 trees in the middle of the night, let alone without a single person seeing or hearing a thing.
Sue them all and let God sort them out.
I don't know much about Aussie evidentiary standards but in murrican, that argument alone wouldn't get you beyond reasonable doubt