this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1008 points (94.3% liked)

Greentext

4342 readers
945 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 41 points 11 months ago (3 children)

They're voting in anti-immgrant right wing politicians. Same with Germany, Spain, and France

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's not a fiscal policy. A country or block of countries can be right about 1 thing and wrong about others.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It is though. Guess what the number one Argument made against migrants is.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The number one argument made against migrants is whatever that person thinks sounds the least like "I'm just xenophobic"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Right but the politicians argument is always "our social system cant afford it". A fiscal argument.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That doesn't make it a fiscal policy

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

If it relates to the governments expenditures then it is a fiscal argument. If the policy is based on such a fiscal argument then it is a fiscal policy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

And if I spray paint some stripes onto my dog, a tiger I did not make. they can claim its about fiscal policy all they want, it rarely is

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

You start out in 1954 by saying, “n!gger, n!gger, n!gger.” By 1968 you can’t say “n!gger”—that hurts you, backfires. So you say stuff like, uh, forced busing, states’ rights, and all that stuff, and you’re getting so abstract. Now, you’re talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you’re talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is, blacks get hurt worse than whites.… “We want to cut this,” is much more abstract than even the busing thing, uh, and a hell of a lot more abstract than “n!gger, n!gger.”

  • Lee Atwater, 1981

https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy/

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Right so you agree that the fiscal policies and anti-migration laws targeting specific races are inextricably linked?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

This is "states rights" levels of pedantic, incorrect stubbornness.

What they wrote down into law was fiscal, but just saying "fiscal policy" completely ignores the whole context to an absurd abstract degree, and this is intentional.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The discussion originally was about how the fiscal policies in European countries are good even though they have racist migration laws, I wanted to show that this is a fiscal policy too, as in they absolutely have racist fiscal policy.

I believe we are on the same side here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If we're on the same side, stop taking the other side at their word by calling it "fiscal policy".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If someone says to me that the racist policies and the fiscal policies are different, when they arent, I think its important to stress that some of the racist policies and in fact most of them, are fiscal.

I am not trying to diminish a racist policy by calling it fiscal, I'm trying to highlight that some of the fiscal policies are racist. And that that the European liberal model is inextricably tied to racism, because some people here want to export european fiscal policies to the US in the hopes of fighting injustice but they would be copying racist policies that would still perpetuate injustice.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 11 months ago

Seems to be that they're not integrating here and creating a parallel society and increase in crime.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

If there's one thing the right are good at it's indoctrination. They co-opt spaces and then use them to infect people with their mindset.

And damn is it ever effective. Someone close to me is normally a leftist – she proudly supports her union (and unions in general), is strongly in favor of LGBT+ rights and environmental protection, mistrusts most political parties as they're too much in bed with big business etc.

However, she also hangs out on 9GAG, which apparently has been pretty much taken over by the right. This has greatly affected her views on immigrants since she's exposed to unchallenged right-wing drivel every day. It was "fun" when she told me how refugee facilities are hotbeds of violent crime and then it turned out that the unspecified statistics she was basing this on were mostly about violence against refugees.

(Not that those camps perfectly safe by themselves but not in the way right wingers make it sound like refugees and immigrants (who are conflated) are all violent anarchists who are above the law.)

Recently she just had to share this "joke" with me. The whole thing consisted of two police officers with Turkish names finding a generic German name exotic. That was it; I couldn't find any punchline in there, just a "the immigrants are replacing us" message. I'm just writing for the day when I hear the word "Überfremdung" ("overforeigning", a standard term of the far right) out of her mouth.

It goes on like that. Politically she's convinced that the Greens are completely unviable as a party and the worst part of the current government – the FDP (our liberal party for rich people) gets no mention despite being diametrically opposed to most of her core views. Ricarda Lang (a Green politician) being fat is much more important and will never get old.

I have no idea how to counter this but I'm afraid that she'll drift off into the hard right with time. She seems unwilling to accept that her main source of funnies is also chock full of right wing propaganda.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

My old working class neighbourhood used to be relatively safe, now it isn't. A major demographic change occurred. It's not hard to see what happened.

This chronic inability by some on the left to acknowledge that mass immigration does at least some damage to the social fabric, is part of why the rightoids are winning. People on the ground can see it, and shouting to the contrary from ivory tower PMC liberals who consider themselves lefties is not going to change that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

In Canada we are undergoing a collapse of the healthcare system and a shortage of housing.

But if you say "maybe bringing more people into the country when we can't house or care for the people who are already here is a bad idea," suddenly you're a racist.

Immigration policy has real effects on the lives of current citizens, and it is not racist to acknowledge those effects.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago

That is part if the problem. The other part, at least is my country, is that the left is failing to present a believable alternative. Idealistic rhetoric from an ivory tower doesn't convince people their practical problems will be solved.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Yeah this seems to be the case all over.