this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
18 points (95.0% liked)

Malaysian News

409 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to News

For non-political news and discussion about Malaysia.

Here are some basic rules:

Visit our sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
18
Here’s Why Malaysia and Other Countries Are Decriminalizing Suicide (time.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Not quite a news but a general piece on the subject.

Key points:

  • The Dewan Rakyat recently passed a bill to decriminalise suicide attempt. The removal of Section 309 of the Penal Code - which informed the punishment for suicide attempt with jail term and fine, was seen as a crucial milestone in the legal reform, and welcomed by many.
  • Sec. 309 has its roots in the British Common Law, which existed with the reasoning that criminalising suicide (making it punishable) would be an act of prevention. However, studies have shown that there is no proof of its effectiveness - countries with laws criminalising suicide do not show a lower suicide rate than those without such a law.
  • In fact, criminalising suicide may indeed mask the truth in regard to suicide rates and mental health crisis of a country - attempted suicide cases are often not reported as such due to a fear of ramification.
  • Decriminalising suicide - as crucial it is - is just a first step toward building a more comprehensive framework for suicide prevention and rehabilitation, including coming up with policies to provide help like therapy for those at risks.
  • Beyond legal matters, there should also be more effort in place to remove social stigma surrounding mental health problems and suicide, to encourage more people to speak up and reach out for help.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reason why i used the word "forced" (other than my poor vocabulary knowledge), is because some people thinks that they doesnt need such therapy, or believe in such treatment. Forcing them to go to such treatment might not yield any result (since they are forced to go in the first place), but there are chances that they MIGHT change yheir view after a few session.

But anywho, at least now authority will grt involved when someone else came across attempt suicide cases without worrying about affecting people involved negatively.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Haha, I get what you mean, just that we usually don't use the word "force" (as the other friend pointed out, mandatory might be more apt here) because of the more negative connotation, but yeah.

And you did raise some good perspective too, including the perception of some people towards mental health treatment like therapy. Having a structure/system where we expose a person to mental health treatment (therapy), even if just for running a formal procedure, might be, in logic, better than not giving people the opportunity to get any help at all, but that also raises some questions, not just practical, but a lot of ethical ones as well.

Definitely as a MHP I'm inclined to agree with including counselling and therapy (mandatory or otherwise) in the treatment for people with suicidal risks or record. But was also sharing (a bit lamenting, ha) about the shortcomings of the current healthcare system in implementing the policies.

Can't say there is an ideal solution to that - but indeed some form of help is needed, and if it's structured as a standard policy, it's certainly for the better.