this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
89 points (91.6% liked)

Technology

34815 readers
61 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.

Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.

Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
89
Meta can rage farm Mastodon without controlling it (lemmy.ca)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
22 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/1185025

Meta can introduce their signature rage farming to the Fediverse. They don't need to control Mastodon. All they have to do is introduce it in their app. Show every Threads user algorithmically filtered content from the Fediverse precisely tailored for maximum rage. When the rage inducing content came from Mastodon, the enraged Thread users will flood that Mastodon threads with the familiar rage-filled Facebook comment section vomit. This in turn will enrage Mastodon users, driving them to engage, at least in the short to mid term. All the while Meta sells ads in-between posts. And that's how they rage farm the Fediverse without EEE-ing the technology. Meta can effectively EEE the userbase. The last E is something Meta may not intend but would likely happen. It consists of a subset of the Fediverse users leaving the network or segregating themselves in a small vomit-free bubble.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Meta can do whatever they want with Threads, in the exact same way that mastodon.social is it's own independent instance and can do as it pleases.

If Mastodon users want to follow or even see content on Threads, it's entirely optional, depending on your current instance's stance. You can always move to another instance that shares your views (and there will be plenty that do) and has defederated from Threads, or you could roll your own instance and be in control of what instances you interact/federate with for yourself.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly, I would just join an instance that defederates from threads.