this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
58 points (98.3% liked)

askchapo

22652 readers
235 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try [email protected] if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've recently read"The Verge: Reformation, Renaissance, and Forty Years that Shook the World" and want to hear what all of you think the answer is, because I feel like the book was missing something in its thesis and I am not very sure what that is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

also no work animals, most crops weren't great for massive-scale farming.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Corn and potatoes are notoriously great for large scale farming. Or are you talking about African yams?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

that's two. farming caught on in those regions where those plants were grown on a decent scale. Most other farming was small scale.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

You said there were no crops for massive scale farming yet we do massive scale farming with american crops. Also corn was grown at some scale all along the Mississippi and the deep south, thats how you get Cahokia. It wasnt just limited to Mexico.

The fact that those crops weren't used at such large scale as the Europeans is due to the societal structures of the Americans not the lack of capable plants. Europeans enclosed the commons and privatized land ownership, the Americans didn't. It has nothing to do with the lack of correct plants.