this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
250 points (98.1% liked)

World News

32368 readers
631 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everything needs proper context. We shouldn't make decisions based on headlines.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, I read it. Did you? It said:

"Mickleborough said the emoji amounted to an agreement because he had texted numerous contracts to Achter, who previously confirmed through text message and always fulfilled the order."

It does not say that the argument was made that he previously agreed to a contract through text message _ by sending a single ๐Ÿ‘_.

This is the context we have through the article, and so no, a single emoji as a binding contract is ridiculous.