Technology

59200 readers

2519 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

284

SpaceX blasts FCC as it refuses to reinstate Starlink’s $886 million grant (arstechnica.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

SpaceX blasts FCC as it refuses to reinstate Starlink’s $886 million grant::FCC doubts ability to provide high-speed, low-latency service in all grant areas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 40 points 11 months ago (1 children)

this applicant had failed to meet its burden to be entitled to nearly $900 million in universal service funds for almost a decade

Maybe we should invest in another company that will actually deserve it.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The problem is that this company doesn't exist.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

This grant was originally not going to even allow satellite providers - the idea was it was going to go to hundreds of small fiber and wireless ISPs who needed the money to build infrastructure to rural areas that is not profitable on the face of it.

A one-time grant like this isn't going to make or break Starlink - they're not building anything infrastructure with the money (the satellites burn up in a few years and need to be replaced - are they going to need ongoing grants?), so basically it's just giving free money to SpaceX. Whereas if the money went to a company building fiber or wireless repeaters that money would pay itself back over and over again and the fees would just pay for maintenance

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

If only there was some way for the government to take the money, then just like... Directly hire qualified people to actually do it.

Maybe we could take a little money from everyone, then charge just enough to keep the system running?

I know, it's a pretty crazy idea...I mean, it would be expensive up front, but it would be way cheaper for the service. Plus, we could stop paying ISPs to pinkie promise to build out modern infrastructure or lying about serving rural areas to get grants

(Btw, the government bought out iridium, the company that does satellite phones, when they ran out of money and were days away from decommissioning the whole constellation. And they've kept it going for decades... So I bet they could tap those guys for the roadmap to a lower orbit solution... Or we could just keep it wired while we improve the tech)