Technology

37759 readers

413 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

159

Threads Has Begun Federating Via ActivityPub (daringfireball.net)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

143 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Adam Mosseri:

Second, threads posted by me and a few members of the Threads team will be available on other fediverse platforms like Mastodon starting this week. This test is a small but meaningful step towards making Threads interoperable with other apps using ActivityPub — we’re committed to doing this so that people can find community and engage with the content most relevant to them, no matter what app they use.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Are you truly incapable of imagining that someone might have a different opinion than you without being bribed?

"Everyone who disagrees with me must be getting paid" is not the mature take you think it is.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Are you truly incapable of acknowledging that large bags of money motivate people to do unpopular things sometimes?

I really don't care about Mastadon as I haven't used it much, but I couldn't really think of a good reason for federating with Meta.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well a good reason could be that it brings federation to the masses. You know, like everyone who uses federated networks wants it to be. This isn't some exclusive club and wider adoption is a good thing.

If only to prove that it can work.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

I wouldn't call that a good reason to team up with Meta, but I would call it a plausible. Everyone does not want to federate with the largest social media company in the world, I can promise you that. If you like federation, you'd probably like it to not be engulfed by megacorps (unless you stand to profit from it).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

So you have evidence of bribes?

That's cool. Please share with the class.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

LMAO... "bribes"... no, I have no evidence of "bribes." I don't have any evidence of a financial incentive either, as very clearly evident by my phrasing starting with "I bet..." I'm simply relying on 40 years of not having my head completely up my own ass to make some inferences about things, and if I'm wrong, then I'm wrong. I think you're being intentionally obtuse. None of this really is impactful, but you sure seem to have an agenda.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You have evidence that I'm wrong, correct?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

That’s not how the burden of proof works.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Do you understand what "federating" means? It's a permission, not an obligation, for the instances to interact. It can also be filtered in any number of ways by any user.