Technology

59174 readers

2161 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

284

SpaceX blasts FCC as it refuses to reinstate Starlink’s $886 million grant (arstechnica.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

120 comments fedilink hide all child comments

SpaceX blasts FCC as it refuses to reinstate Starlink’s $886 million grant::FCC doubts ability to provide high-speed, low-latency service in all grant areas.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Iowa is pretty flat. It's all farmland that's been plowed a million times (making trenching much easier, and a lot more opportunity for things like directional drilling/conduit drivers).

Try running cable through somewhere with harder ground/rocks, trees, mountains, swamp (Mid Atlantic, Florida, Alabama, Minnesota, etc) dealing with right-of-way, over-populated poles, etc, etc.

Then there's the connection rate. In a more populated area there would be many more final connects, which can drive the cost a lot more than running the mainline. If you run fiber across 20 miles with no connects (just point to point), there's minimal hardware infrastructure along the way. Add in needing switching for 5 communities, now you need buildings, power, termination, switching, runs to houses, etc, etc.

It's not really a good comparison.