Moving to: m/AskMbin!

23 readers

5 users here now

### We are moving! **Join us in our new journey as we take a new direction towards the future for this community at mbin, find our new community here and read this post to know more about why we are moving. Thank you and we hope to see you there!**

founded 1 year ago

What claims are just not backed by historical facts? (kbin.social)

submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

To me, it's: That ancient people thought the Earth was flat.

We have records from around 430BC where Greek philosophers spoke of the Earth being a sphere. In 240BC the Greek astronomer Eratosthenes calculated the circumference of the Earth and was only about 2% out.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To me, it's: That ancient people thought the Earth was flat.

Ancient peoples DID think the Earth was flat.

The conception of a spherical earth was only widely accepted in academic traditions derived from late Greek philosophy and even in those cultures, had a mixed reception in popular conceptions of the earth's shape until the 16th century.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

The question is not if they did or did not think, but if what they thinked was backed by historical facts at the time.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yes. It was backed by the oldest book of events at that time.
There were mathematicians that wrote against Galileo, and a notable one, a Dominican I think.
Everything in the past moves to the category of belief.