Twitter is threatening to sue Meta over concerns about its new Threads app, according to a letter obtained by Semafor. In the letter, which is addressed to Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Twitter lawyer Alex Spiro argues that Meta used Twitter’s trade secrets and intellectual property to build Threads.
Spiro, who is also Elon Musk’s personal lawyer and a partner at the Quinn Emanuel law firm, claims that Meta hired “dozens” of ex-Twitter employees to develop Threads, which wouldn’t be all that surprising given just how many people were fired following Musk’s takeover.
But according to Twitter, many of these former workers still have access to Twitter’s trade secrets and other confidential information. Twitter alleges that Meta took advantage of this and tasked these employees with developing a “copycat” app “in violation of both state and federal law.”
As a result, Twitter is threatening legal action in the form of “both civil remedies and injunctive relief.” It also “demands that Meta take immediate steps to stop using any Twitter trade secrets or other highly confidential information” and says Meta isn’t allowed to crawl or scrape Twitter’s data, either.
Meta responded to Twitter’s letter in a post on Threads, with communications director Andy Stone stating, “No one on the Threads engineering team is a former Twitter employee — that’s just not a thing.” Meta doesn’t seem all too concerned about this, and that may be because Twitter isn’t all that shy about threatening legal action. In May, Twitter accused Microsoft of abusing the company’s API through integrations with some of its products.
Meta launched Threads on Wednesday night, with celebrities and brands the first to get on board. Less than 24 hours since the app’s launch, Threads has garnered over 30 million registered users, while internal data obtained by The Verge’s Alex Heath indicates that users have already made over 95 million threads.
“Competition is fine, cheating is not,” Musk said in a reply to a post about the letter on Twitter.
Does anyone else feel like the core concept of Twitter is not really that interesting in the first place
I’ve gotten some decent use from Twitter over the years, and it was nice they doubled the character count, but I very much prefer places where I can read and post over one paragraph at a time. The concept of 140 characters sort of made sense when it was based on MMS, but it’s not clear if anyone ever even used that after the first couple of years. People would make longer posts by replying to themselves and chaining a dozen posts, but that is an excruciating interface for something that could just be one long post. Plus then people could “like” and reply to each segment individually which is sort of chaotic.
Reddit was the only social-media like site that was geared towards and appropriate for having longer discussions, but it seems like the owners want to dumb it down into TikTok/9Gag. I’m glad Lemmy is here for people who want to use a bunch of words at once and express complete thoughts.
Me think why waste time say lot word when few word do trick. When me president, they see, they see. -Wayne Gretzky -Michael Scott -Kevin Malone
It’s not just you. Twitter doesn’t now and never did anything Facebook doesn’t already do. It’s just a pared down Facebook experience.
It depends on what you're looking for. For me, Twitter is basically an RSS feed of news and people I want to hear from. It's not a social media network for me. That's why all I want is a reverse chronological feed.
This has been a thing I've been saying since twitter was purchased. For most people it was just a pretty RSS feed for whatever interests people had. That's the only thing I ever used it for, for the 6 or so times I logged on over 9 years.
I wonder how many people use Twitter like that. There are so many communities that don’t bubble up to the mainstream on Twitter that it makes me question whether I’m an outlier or whether most people use it the way I do.
Twitter was an open canvas at first, that's what made it appealing. The users shaped it and norms formed. Then the bad men came.
To you it is not.