Self Hosted - Self-hosting your services.

11398 readers

3 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules

No harassment
crossposts from c/Open Source & c/docker & related may be allowed, depending on context
Video Promoting is allowed if is within the topic.
No spamming.
Stay friendly.
Follow the lemmy.ml instance rules.
Tag your post. (Read under)

Important

Beginning of January 1st 2024 this rule WILL be enforced. Posts that are not tagged will be warned and if not fixed within 24h then removed!

Lemmy doesn't have tags yet, so mark it with [Question], [Help], [Project], [Other], [Promoting] or other you may think is appropriate.

Cross-posting

[email protected] is allowed!
[email protected] is allowed!
[email protected] is allowed!
[email protected] is allowed if topic has to do with selfhosting.
[email protected] is allowed!

If you see a rule-breaker please DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

[Question] Proxmox, xcp-ng, or something else? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So, I’ve been self-hosting for decades, but on physical hardware. I’ve had things like MythTV and an asterisk voip system, but those have been abandoned for years. I’ve got a web server, but it’s serving static content that’s only viewed by bots and attackers.

My mail server, that’s been active for more than two decades is still in active use.

All of this makes me weird in the self-hosted community.

About a month ago, I put in a beefy system for virtualization with the intent to start branching out the self hosting. I primarily considered Proxmox and xcp-ng. I went with xcp-ng, primarily because it seems to have more enterprise features. I’m early enough in my exploration that switching isn’t a problem.

For those of you more advanced in a home-lab hypervisor, what did you go with and why? Right now, I’m pretty agnostic. I’m comfortable with xcp-ng but have no problems switching. I’m particularly interested in opinions that have a particularly negative view of one or the other, so long as you explain why.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don't actually want to allow external untrusted people accessing your server, why go the VM route? That seems like a huge waste of resources and just complicates things compared to using containers (Podman is best IMHO).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no problems with untrusted people accessing resources I intend to be public. A VM provides an extra layer of protection in that scenario, as does a container. I’ve been playing with Lemmy containerized in an xcp-ng VM.

But really, it’s a chance to learn and play with something new.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean as in renting out servers (VMs), where untrusted people have full root access.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah. Yes, I have no plans to do something like that.

My answer still applies. If there’s a remote code exploit that can be used to gain root, running it in a container just gets you root there. Running it in a VM only gets you root there. Both provide layers to protect the underlying OS.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Indeed, VMs are more secure than containers, but they come had a quite heavy price performance wise and are also harder to maintain. With Podman you can manage containers just like any other systemd service, which is really convenient.