Fediverse

28544 readers

360 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to [email protected]!

Rules

Posts must be on topic.
Be respectful of others.
Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

848

Lemmy.world Should Defederate with Threads (lemmy.world)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

435 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I think it's pretty safe to say that the majority of us are here to avoid another corporate takeover of our preferred platforms. It would seem to me to be a tad irresponsible to allow Facebook into our space with open arms, allowing them to hoover up our data. I would love to keep using Lemmy.world, but will happily change instances if need be, and I feel many share that sentiment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 62 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Whichever way instances decide to go there's a few things people should remember:

We're lucky to have this option even if it's divisive at times.
It's not always about what we know will happen, sometimes it's concern over possibilities we couldn't even imagine at the time.
Growth is great but there's infrastructure, moderators and policies that can be overwhelmed.
Defederation can be reversed at any time if things change.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Federation can also be reverted at any times if they misbehave. Why should we block them in advance?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

Track record.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Historical precedent and #2/#3 on my list above make the case for erring on the side of caution. That and we've got far more to lose than to gain.