this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
540 points (95.2% liked)

science

14673 readers
397 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In trials

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

At the same time, commenters don't necessarily know what the fuck they're talking about either.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah Reddit always had that problem, I think it's here too - top rated comment is someone saying it won't work and the article is wrong, everyone just accepts it without question.

I still see people using battery breakthrough stories as an example of stuff that never comes too market despite most of them being in the very phone the person is using.

I genuinely think a lot of them are just people who hate science and engineering so don't want people to be interested in it

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I genuinely think a lot of them are just people who hate science and engineering so don't want people to be interested in it

So strange for those people to hang out in science communities in that case, to me.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

a cat group I started the same time as this has 5k more subs and no whining. it is just cat pics. there are a lot of fake science sites to avoid but they all have bills to pay. they expect it to be like reddit junk and all. been to reddit through search results and sometimes found useful threads. mostly not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I think they come from the front page, I don't think you see it as much on more obscure articles.