this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2023
350 points (96.1% liked)

News

22869 readers
4213 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A US appeals court Saturday paved the way for a California law banning the concealed carry of firearms in “sensitive places” to go into effect January 1, despite a federal judge’s ruling that it is “repugnant to the Second Amendment.”

The law – Senate Bill 2 – had been blocked last week by an injunction from District Judge Cormac Carney, but a three-judge panel filed an order Saturday temporarily blocking that injunction, clearing the path for the law to take effect.

The court issued an administrative stay, meaning the appeals judges did not consider the merits of the case, but delayed the judge’s order to give the court more time to consider the arguments of both sides. “In granting an administrative stay, we do not intend to constrain the merits panel’s consideration of the merits of these appeals in any way,” the judges wrote.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

For one, people get uncomfortable around someone open carrying in public, so it’s more polite to have it concealed.

I don't know that we should be basing our gun laws around what makes people comfortable. On either side of the equation. They should be based on data that allowing or disallowing something regarding guns is safe for the general public and effective when it comes to crime and self-defense. Or at least that is what I think and I would be open to hearing an argument against that beyond an overly-broad interpretation of the Second Amendment where all gun regulations should be nullified.

And the second reason is that if someone was planning on starting something, openly carrying a gun just makes you the first target. Concealed carry gives the element of surprise

This is another thing I have seen people claim here several times without data and, at the risk of offending some, I would again like to see some data which actually supports this claim.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

There isn't need for data, it's just logic.

If you were going to rob a store and the person ahead of you openly has a gun on their hip, you're either going to leave, take them out, or steal their weapon.

If your're the one openly carrying, every person within arms reach could be a threat, and you'll never know how much OCing actually deterred any action.

If want data, feel free to find some, don't respond to every argument put into this thread with "I'd like to see some data"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Of course there is a need for data. Just because something sounds logical to you doesn't mean it is true. Shouldn't we be making laws on what is true and not what feels true?

If want data, feel free to find some, don’t respond to every argument put into this thread with “I’d like to see some data”

It is not my job to back up other people's claims. Why do you think I should accept your claim or anyone else's because you think it's logical?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

That would make sense if there were facts that we all agreed on…..

[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Logic isn't subjective.

I didn't enter into this conversation to contribute to some well researched discussion that you keep demanding from everyone that doesn't agree with you. You seemed like you wanted perspective from someone who understood the pro-gun position. I provided it, goodbye.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

Logic is as subjective as you allow the premises you are working from be. Which is why logic is different than fact.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

There is absolutely a need for data. This is why everyone says the pro-gun sides have no arguments. There’s no concrete data you can point to just “much logic”, which means nothing in conversations where facts need to be brought up.