lemmy.ml meta

1406 readers

1 users here now

Anything about the lemmy.ml instance and its moderation.

For discussion about the Lemmy software project, go to [email protected].

founded 3 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

3042

Lemmy.ml has now blocked threads.net / Meta (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

559 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It should come as no surprise that the lemmy.ml admin team took about 2 minutes to decide to pre-emptively block threats / Meta. Their transparent and opportunistic scheme to commodify the fediverse and it's users will not be allowed to proceed.

We strongly encourage other instance administrators to do the same, given the grave threat they pose to the fediverse.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my personal opinion, Lemmy should be more focused on content rather than RAPID growth.

Growth is usually related to corporations mindset, which is a "for-profit" mindset, and unfortunately, as we seen in the past it, it comes with "by all means" attitude, results in manipulating users, make users addicted, and more actions at the expense of the users.

You'll see that when Lemmy will pile up more content, the community will naturally grow in a healthy manner.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess I didn't specify well. What I meant was if Mastodon is an ad free (or at least let ads and more private) alternative to view Threads posts, along with Mastodon posts wouldn't that reduce the number of threads accounts and reduce their growth? So wouldn't defederating actually help draw more people to threads? Plus how would defederating reduce the E/E/E process that everyone is worried about? I would think it would accelerate it or best case have no impact...

Also I think I may have replied to the wrong comment lol