this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
62 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2244 readers
7 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
China actually sets up police stations in other countries to keep people in line about what they say about China. This article is not a stretch.
then, again: it'd be nice to provide literally any details of that--this article basically presupposes this to be occurring without providing any details at all
As FBI director Wray is cited in 'How China Tries to Intimidate Its Dissidents Living Overseas' (2020), for example:
A more recent analysis on China's illegal police stations can be found at 'China's Consular Volunteers.'
But there are very good sources across the web.
Addition:
In December 2021, a 'Private Investigator' working for the CCP has been advised to also consider physically attacking the Victim. In a voice message intercepted by the police, it was said:
Source
Do you need every article that talks about carbon emissions to first demonstrate the legitimacy of global warming?
this is such a false equivalence it might as well be a nonsequitur--this isn't "demonstrating basic inferential science that has been known about for over 100 years", it amounts to an accusation of violating the sovereignty of another country and yes, that should be seriously scrutinized and demonstrated (especially given the tensions between the US and China, and the long tail of anti-Asian sentiment caused by COVID)
So what would you say is the appropriate course of action? For the FBI to out the identities and statements of people who report Chinese state harassment in the US? To keep the information entirely a secret otherwise?
Like, the FBI warning people that there's a danger without totally tipping their hand seems like a reasonable move to make if they have such evidence. They don't need to present it in order to do that.
Likewise, while it would certainly make a better story and a better read if it provided some additional background information, that's not what this piece is. It's literally just reporting the announcement.
Honestly, I'm not sure where your opposition to it is outside of simply reacting to criticism of the Chinese government. Which, honestly, is a little shady.
West Taiwan isn't going to love you, give it up
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/two-arrested-operating-illegal-overseas-police-station-chinese-government